The increase in pixel count to 21.1 million effective pixels and the Digic 4 processor could also have been anticipated. With the possible exception of its HD video capability, this camera’s specification was fairly predictable, and the upgrade was primarily about bringing the camera into line with Canon’s other DSLR offerings with the inclusion of Live View technology, a sensor cleaning system, 14-bit processing, Highlight Tone Priority and Auto Lighting Optimiser. However, after around three years it was starting to look a little dated and in September 2008 its replacement, the EOS 5D Mark II, was unveiled. ![]() Canon has in the past been guilty of being a little too liberal with its noise-reduction algorithms, and some of the EOS 5D’s APS-C-format contemporaries were prone to producing rather soft JPEG files as a result.Īs it sat just on the right side of affordability (in comparison to Canon’s EOS-1D-series DSLRs), the EOS 5D was a big seller and was popular with professional and enthusiast photographers alike. It’s worth remembering at this point that sometimes it isn’t the amount of visible noise that is a problem for image quality, but the level of noise reduction that is applied to the files. The larger sensor also allowed room for bigger photoreceptors so, in addition to having a greater pixel count, the camera could produce images with less noise than its APS-C-format counterparts. It allowed them to use the lenses they had been using on their Canon 35mm film cameras and see exactly the same composition in the viewfinder. Canon EOS 5D Mark IIĬanon’s EOS 5D was the first camera to make full-frame digital photography possible for many enthusiast photographers. I used both of these approaches during this test to produce comparable images. The second is to adjust the focal length so that the effective angle of view is the same on both cameras. The first is to have greater distance between the subject and the APS-C-format camera than with the full-frame model. There are essentially two ways of matching the framing of images when shooting with APS-C-format and full-frame cameras. How we match composition to compare cameras The EOS 5D Mark II and EOS 7D will be the main focus, but I’ll also compare the results from the Nikon D3S and D300S, and the Sony Alpha 850 and Alpha 550, and look at the pros and cons of full-frame and APS-C-format photography. In this test I’m going to see if the new generation of APS-C cameras really can produce the type of quality we have come to expect from full-frame models. Angela Nicholson looks at the Canon EOS 7D and EOS 5D Mark II to see whether full frame still holds an advantage.Įveryone likes to hear a David and Goliath-type story where two seemingly unevenly matched opponents clash and the minnow comes out victorious.įor photographers, the possibility that a small-format camera can produce similar (or even better) quality images to a model with a larger sensor is enticing on several levels, not least because the smaller sensor size usually makes the camera more affordable.Īs such, there was quite a bit of excitement when our test of the APS-C-format Canon EOS 7D revealed that it produces images that give the full-frame EOS 5D Mark II a run for its money. Overall, if you’re planning to use your 7D for professional work, don’t be worried, I’m sure it can handle most situations but you need to invest in proper lenses and get some external flashes as well.Progress made with in-camera noise suppression and high-sensitivity performance means that APS-C-format cameras now produce larger, better-quality images than ever before. I find myself reaching out for the 7D when I’m shooting outdoor portraits of the couple or during the reception when I need to get some candid shots.Īlso, I will not use it indoors without an external flash or any adequate light source. I will definitely not use it as my primary camera during weddings but it will serve as a good backup camera.Īs I’ve already mentioned, its AF is fast and I really like its color and skin tones. ![]() Honestly, the Canon 7D is decent as a professional tool, it can certainly get the job done. The Canon EOS 7D can record high-definition video at a maximum resolution of 1,920 x 1,080 pixels with a 16:9 aspect ratio. For example, if you’re using an 18-135mm lens on the Canon 7D then it will act like a 28-220mm lens on a full frame camera. Well, this means that the effective focal length of your lens is multiplied by 1.6x. Since the Canon EOS 7D has a smaller APS-C sensor compared to a full frame DSLR, it has a crop factor of 1.6x.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |